the arrow submodule in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/44696 is finally building reliably in our CI. i would love some help with review, especially for the changes under debian/ and ceph.spec.in On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 3:32 PM Casey Bodley <cbodley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 1:21 PM Casey Bodley <cbodley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > after discussion with our Debian/Ubuntu maintainers, we've decided > > that Ceph will need to build arrow from a submodule for the quincy > > release. both distros do provide the dependencies necessary for a > > minimal build of arrow/parquet. i'm working through the cmake > > integration of the arrow submodule in > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/44696 > > > > for Centos, Kaleb has packaged arrow and its missing dependencies and > > made them available in the Centos Storage SIG > > (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage). i'm a bit wary > > about requiring that our Centos users install this additional repo via > > 'yum install centos-release-ceph', though. the Storage SIG is also > > going to host Centos' ceph release packages, so it may not a good idea > > to mix those repos with our upstream download.ceph.com repo > > > > getting this stuff into EPEL would be ideal - even if it was just > > enough to enable us to build the arrow submodule - but it sounds like > > some obstacles remain here. what do people think about requiring this > > extra centos-release-ceph repo for quincy? could that be acceptable as > > a last resort? > > utf8proc seems to be the only extra dependency that was missing, so i > added that as a submodule too. https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/44696 > is building on centos now without any dependency on the Storage SIG > repo _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
