On Thursday, 2. August 2001 21:09, David Gümbel wrote: [a lot of stuff] > As I would guess (but don't exactly know) that MS has not taken step 2, the > second (binary) part of the message schuld have had the > application/octet-stream content type and have the MS-specific stuff done > in a private header field, as stated in: The "private header field" part of that statement is nonsense. H.Chan is right, of course. And please replace "schuld" with "should" in your mind :-) Regards, David Gümbel -- "Black holes are where god is dividing by zero." Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/
