On 10/29/2012 08:44 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote: > On 25/10/12 15:25 +0200, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: >> Hi Jacek, >> >> On 10/25/2012 2:49 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: >>>> Which symbols are we talking about? >>>> >>>> do you have a list? >>>> >>>> In theory libtotem_pg should never use libqb directly >>> >>> Searching for shared objects with unresolved symbols... >>> Unresolved symbols found in: >>> /home/users/jajcus/tmp/corosync-2.1.0-root-jajcus/usr/lib/libtotem_pg.so.5.0.0 >>> >>> qb_loop_poll_del >>> qb_strerror_r >>> qb_util_nano_current_get >>> qb_loop_timer_add >>> qb_loop_poll_add >>> qb_loop_timer_del >>> DONE >> >> thanks, you are absolutely right. >> >> libtotem_pg must link with link with libqb. >> >> Angus: perhaps this change could make other parts of totem easier? like >> logging for example? > > Maybe a little, but I think Steve had some reasons for making totem > as much as possible a standalone lib. Yes, the original reason Steven had was to avoid linking against any external libraries. now, this is not the case anymore as we _must_ link with libqb and there for there is no reason to avoid using it properly if that can avoid other complexities. Fabio _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
