On 25/10/12 15:25 +0200, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
Hi Jacek,
On 10/25/2012 2:49 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
Which symbols are we talking about?
do you have a list?
In theory libtotem_pg should never use libqb directly
Searching for shared objects with unresolved symbols...
Unresolved symbols found in: /home/users/jajcus/tmp/corosync-2.1.0-root-jajcus/usr/lib/libtotem_pg.so.5.0.0
qb_loop_poll_del
qb_strerror_r
qb_util_nano_current_get
qb_loop_timer_add
qb_loop_poll_add
qb_loop_timer_del
DONE
thanks, you are absolutely right.
libtotem_pg must link with link with libqb.
Angus: perhaps this change could make other parts of totem easier? like
logging for example?
Maybe a little, but I think Steve had some reasons for making totem
as much as possible a standalone lib.
-Angus
Fabio
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
