On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 03:21:54PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 14:05, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Should we perhaps also do this for latency_nice == 0?, in any case I > > think this can be moved to its own patch to avoid doing too much in the > > one patch. It seems fairly self contained. > > This function is then removed by patch 9 as the additional rb tree > fixes all cases Also, since you remove it again later, perhaps not introduce it at all?
