On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 16:08, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 03:21:54PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 14:05, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Should we perhaps also do this for latency_nice == 0?, in any case I > > > think this can be moved to its own patch to avoid doing too much in the > > > one patch. It seems fairly self contained. > > > > This function is then removed by patch 9 as the additional rb tree > > fixes all cases > > Also, since you remove it again later, perhaps not introduce it at all? Yes, I have done the split to easily revert patch 8 if needed but keep good behavior. I can probably remove this and patch 9 completly
