Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Can you send along the responses from "ceph df detail" and ceph "ceph osd
pool ls detail"

Respectfully,

*Wes Dillingham*
wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/wesleydillingham>


On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 1:03 PM Eugen Block <eblock@xxxxxx> wrote:

> I suspect the target_max_misplaced_ratio (default 0.05). You could try
> setting it to 1 and see if it helps. This has been discussed multiple
> times on this list, check out the archives for more details.
>
> Zitat von Louis Koo <zhucan.k8s@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Thanks for your responses, I want to know why it spend much time to
> > reduce the pg num?
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux