Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？
From: "Louis Koo" <zhucan.k8s@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2023 04:06:53 -0000
In-reply-to: <CAA6-MF9nvK9bdaJVYxY47Xe4qW779x2eOB6wTRvoXAAfdn6Kpw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA6-MF9nvK9bdaJVYxY47Xe4qW779x2eOB6wTRvoXAAfdn6Kpw@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: HyperKitty on http://lists.ceph.io/

Thanks for your responses, I want to know why it spend much time to reduce the pg num?
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？
  - From: Eugen Block

References:
- Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？
  - From: Janne Johansson

Prev by Date: RADOSGW not authenticating with Keystone. Quincy release
Next by Date: Re: Quincy release -Swift integration with Keystone
Previous by thread: Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？
Next by thread: Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Information on CEPH] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Ceph Development] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Linux USB Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [xfs]

Powered by Linux