Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I suspect the target_max_misplaced_ratio (default 0.05). You could try setting it to 1 and see if it helps. This has been discussed multiple times on this list, check out the archives for more details.

Zitat von Louis Koo <zhucan.k8s@xxxxxxxxx>:

Thanks for your responses, I want to know why it spend much time to reduce the pg num?
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux