Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？
From: "Louis Koo" <zhucan.k8s@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 07:02:56 -0000
In-reply-to: <20230606170321.Horde.wn_qcux6s_WSuCT9Bpo86OY@webmail.nde.ag>
References: <20230606170321.Horde.wn_qcux6s_WSuCT9Bpo86OY@webmail.nde.ag>
User-agent: HyperKitty on http://lists.ceph.io/

I had set it from 0.05 to 1 with "ceph config set mon target_max_misplaced_ratio 1.0", it's still invalid.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？
  - From: Konstantin Shalygin

References:
- Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？
  - From: Eugen Block

Prev by Date: Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？
Next by Date: rbd ls failed with operation not permitted
Previous by thread: Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？
Next by thread: Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Information on CEPH] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Ceph Development] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Linux USB Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [xfs]

Powered by Linux