Re: Migrate a bucket from replicated pool to ec pool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 4:31 AM Boris Behrens <bb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Casey,
>
>> changes to the user's default placement target/storage class don't
>> apply to existing buckets, only newly-created ones. a bucket's default
>> placement target/storage class can't be changed after creation
>
>
> so I can easily update the placement rules for this user and can migrate existing buckets one at a time. Very cool. Thanks
>
>>
>> you might add the EC pool as a new storage class in the existing
>> placement target, and use lifecycle transitions to move the objects.
>> but the bucket's default storage class would still be replicated, so
>> new uploads would go there unless the client adds a
>> x-amz-storage-class header to override it. if you want to change those
>> defaults, you'd need to create a new bucket and copy the objects over
>
>
> Can you link me to documentation. It might be the monday, but I do not understand that totally.

https://docs.ceph.com/en/octopus/radosgw/placement/#adding-a-storage-class
should cover the addition of a new storage class for your EC pool

>
> Do you know how much more CPU/RAM EC takes, and when (putting, reading, deleting objects, recovering OSD failure)?

i don't have any data on that myself. maybe others on the list can share theirs?

>
>
> --
> Die Selbsthilfegruppe "UTF-8-Probleme" trifft sich diesmal abweichend im groüen Saal.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux