Hmm.. I will check what the user is deleting. Maybe this is it. Do you know if this bug is new in 15.2.16? I can't share the data, but I can share the metadata: https://pastebin.com/raw/T1YYLuec For the missing files I have, the multipart file is not available in rados, but the 0 byte file is. The rest is more or less identical. The seem to use the aws-sdk-dotnet (aws-sdk-dotnet-coreclr/3.3.110.57 aws-sdk-dotnet-core/3.3.106.11), but so small multiparts are very strange. I guess you can really screw up configs but who am I to judge. Am Di., 14. Juni 2022 um 00:29 Uhr schrieb J. Eric Ivancich < ivancich@xxxxxxxxxx>: > There is no known bug that would cause the rados objects underlying an RGW > object to be removed without a user requesting the RGW object be deleted. > > There is a known bug where the bucket index might not get updated > correctly after user-requested operations. So perhaps the user removed the > rgw object, but it still incorrectly shows up in the bucket index. The PR > for the fix for that bug merged into the octopus branch, but after 15.2.16. > See: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/45902 > > So it should be in the next octopus release. > > I also find it odd that a 250KB file gets a multipart object. What do we > know about the original object? Do we know it’s size? Could the multipart > upload never have completed? In that case there could be incomplete > multipart entries in the bucket index, but they should never have been > finalized into a regular bucket index entry. > > Are you willing to share all the bucket index entries related to this > object? > > Eric > (he/him) _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |