Thanks for the reply. I believe regarding "0" vs "0.0" its the same difference. I will note its not just changing crush weights which induces this situation. Introducing upmaps manually or via the balancer also causes the PGs to be degraded instead of the expected remapped PG state. Respectfully, *Wes Dillingham* wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/wesleydillingham> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 9:27 PM Szabo, Istvan (Agoda) < Istvan.Szabo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Isn’t it the correct syntax like this? > > ceph osd crush reweight osd.1 0.0 ? > > Istvan Szabo > Senior Infrastructure Engineer > --------------------------------------------------- > Agoda Services Co., Ltd. > e: istvan.szabo@xxxxxxxxx > --------------------------------------------------- > > On 2022. Jun 14., at 0:38, Wesley Dillingham <wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > ceph osd crush reweight osd.1 0 > > > ------------------------------ > This message is confidential and is for the sole use of the intended > recipient(s). It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by copyright > or other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know > by reply email and delete it from your system. It is prohibited to copy > this message or disclose its content to anyone. Any confidentiality or > privilege is not waived or lost by any mistaken delivery or unauthorized > disclosure of the message. All messages sent to and from Agoda may be > monitored to ensure compliance with company policies, to protect the > company's interests and to remove potential malware. Electronic messages > may be intercepted, amended, lost or deleted, or contain viruses. > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |