The weighted category prioritization clearly identifies reliability as the top priority. Daniel > Am 18.11.2021 um 15:32 schrieb Sasha Litvak <alexander.v.litvak@xxxxxxxxx>: > > Perhaps I missed something, but does the survey concludes that users don't > value reliability improvements at all? This would explain why developers > team wants to concentrate on performance and ease of management. > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021, 07:23 Stefan Kooman <stefan@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 11/18/21 14:09, Maged Mokhtar wrote: >>> Hello Cephers, >>> >>> i too am for LTS releases or for some kind of middle ground like longer >>> release cycle and/or have even numbered releases designated for >>> production like before. We all use LTS releases for the base OS when >>> running Ceph, yet in reality we depend much more on the Ceph code than >>> the base OS. >>> >>> Another thing we hear our users want, after stability, is performance. >>> it ultimately determines the cost of the storage solution. I think this >>> should be high on the priority list. I know there has been a lot of >>> effort with Crimson development for a while, but from my opinion if Ceph >>> was run by a purely commercial company, getting this out the door as >>> quickly as possible would take priority. >> >> That is in line with the results from the last Ceph User Survey (2021): >> >> >> >> https://ceph.io/en/news/blog/2021/2021-ceph-user-survey-results/#based-on-weighted-category-prioritization >> >> So there is a dedicated group of people involved in the "next gen" OSD >> storage sub system, which is a big endeavor. In the mean time there are >> several developers improving the current implementation incrementally. >> Zac is doing a great job improving the documentation. Cephadm team is >> working on improving management. As as I have read correctly they will >> have access to a large cluster to improve ... the next thing on the prio >> list: scalability, in this case scalability of the management system. >> >> If there is a separate "quality" team for the No. 1 priority: >> Reliability? I don't know. Maybe that is just implicit in the project, >> to make things reliable by default? That might be an interesting thing >> to ask in the upcoming user+dev meeting ... >> >> Gr. Stefan >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx >> > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |