Re: slow down keys/s in recovery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> If so why the client op priority is default 63 and recovery op is 3? This means that by default recovery op is more prioritize than client op!
> 
> Exactly the opposite.  Client ops take priority over recovery ops.  And various other ops have priorities as described in the document I pointed you to.


Now that I poke around, I do find some resources that claim that a *lower* osd_recovery_op_priority value *increases* the priority of recovery ops vs client ops, eg. this one:

https://www.suse.com/support/kb/doc/?id=000019693

This is counter to everything I’ve always been told and observed.  Poking around in the sources my should-be-in-bed eyes don’t find a definitive answer, but I do see in OpRequest.cc :

  if (req->get_priority() < tracker->cct->_conf->osd_client_op_priority) {
    // don't warn as quickly for low priority ops 
    warn_interval_multiplier = tracker->cct->_conf->osd_recovery_op_warn_multiple;
  }

which seems to corroborate the idea that a lower value is a lower priority.

If we can get consensus here I’ll add a bit to the docs to make the relationship more clear.


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux