If it uses PriorityQueue <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priority_queue#:~:text=In%20computer%20science%2C%20a%20priority,an%20element%20with%20low%20priority.> Data Structure an element with high priority should be dequeued before an element with low priority. On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:32 PM Seena Fallah <seenafallah@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Higher recovery priority might cause performance degradation until > recovery completes." > But what about this statement? I found this that it means if I set > priority to 63, I will lose the cluster performance for clients. Am I > wrong? Does it mean the performance for recovery? > > I'm using nautilus 14.2.14. > > [1] > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/1.3/html/configuration_guide/osd_configuration_reference > Can you please point me to the correct section. I don't find the point of > this doc. > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:04 PM Peter Lieven <pl@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Am 02.12.20 um 15:04 schrieb Seena Fallah: >> > I don't think so! I want to slow down the recovery not speed up and it >> says >> > I should reduce these values. >> >> >> I read the documentation the same. Low value = low weight, High value = >> high weight. [1] >> >> Operations with higher weight get easier dispatched. >> >> >> May I ask which exact issue are you seeing and which ceph version are you >> using? >> >> >> Peter >> >> >> [1] >> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/1.3/html/configuration_guide/osd_configuration_reference >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |