Den tors 14 maj 2020 kl 10:46 skrev Amudhan P <amudhan83@xxxxxxxxx>: > Will EC based write benefit from Public network and Cluster network? > I guess this depends on what parameters you use. All in all I think using one network is probably better, and the cases where I have seen missing heartbeats, it's not the network that prevents packets from coming over, it is the OSDs that make themselves busy doing something else instead of heartbeating that makes them flip out, so if you can set it up with LACP or other kinds of bonding, you allow the OSD hosts to use the network optimally regardless of what state they are in. > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 1:39 PM lin yunfan <lin.yunfan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> That is correct.I didn't explain it clearly. I said that is because in >> some write only scenario the public network and cluster network will >> all be saturated the same time. >> linyunfan >> >> Janne Johansson <icepic.dz@xxxxxxxxx> 于2020年5月14日周四 下午3:42写道： >> > >> > Den tors 14 maj 2020 kl 08:42 skrev lin yunfan <lin.yunfan@xxxxxxxxx>: >> >> >> >> Besides the recoverry scenario , in a write only scenario the cluster >> >> network will use the almost the same bandwith as public network. >> > -- May the most significant bit of your life be positive. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |