On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Hans van den Bogert <hansbogert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Just to get this really straight, Jewel OSDs do send this metadata? > Otherwise I'm probably mistaken that I ever saw 10.2.x versions in the > output. RGW daemons only started sending metadata in Luminous. OSD/mon/MDS daemons already sent metadata in Jewel. John > > Thanks, > > Hans > > On 2 Nov 2017 12:31 PM, "John Spray" <jspray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Hans van den Bogert >> <hansbogert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > During our upgrade from Jewel to Luminous I saw the following behaviour, >> > if >> > my memory serves me right: >> > >> > When upgrading for example monitors and OSDs, we saw that the `ceph >> > versions` command correctly showed at one that some OSDs were still on >> > Jewel >> > (10.2.x) and some were already upgraded and thus showed a version of >> > 12.2.0. >> > All as expected -- however, for the RGWs, those only showed up until >> > they >> > were upgraded to luminous. So the command gives a false sense of a >> > complete >> > overview of the Ceph cluster, e.g., in my case this resulted that I >> > forgot >> > about 4 out of 6 RGW instances which were still on Jewel. >> > >> > What are the semantics of the `ceph versions` ? -- Was I wrong in >> > expecting >> > that Jewel RGWs should show up there? >> >> RGW daemons reporting metadata to the mon/mgr daemons is a new >> features in luminous -- older RGW daemons are effectively invisible to >> us, so Jewel daemons will not show up at all in the versions output. >> >> John >> >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Hans >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ceph-users mailing list >> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |