Good to know. Frankly, the RGW isn’t my major concern at the moment, it seems to be able to handle things well enough. It’s the RBD/CephFS side of things for one cluster where we will eventually need to support IPv6 clients but will not necessarily be able to switch everyone to IPv6 in one go. On another cluster I’m concerned about the RADOS side of things where we have some custom “gateways” that use librados to talk to Ceph and expose the storage to their clients via other protocols. Hopefully the dual-stack support on those is mature enough to handle talking to Ceph over IPv4 and clients over IPv6 so we can de-couple the transitions. On 02/07/2017, 18:46, "Simon Leinen" <simon.leinen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I have it running the other way around. The RGW has IPv4 and IPv6, but >> the Ceph cluster is IPv6-only. > >> RGW/librados talks to Ceph ovre IPv6 and handles client traffic on >> both protocols. > >> No problem to run the RGW dual-stacked. > >Just for the record, we've been doing exactly the same for several >years, on multiple clusters. So you're not alone! >-- >Simon. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |