Re: slow requests and short OSD failures in small cluster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Gregory,

Reading your reply with great interest, thanks.

Can you confirm my understanding now:

- live snapshots are more expensive for the cluster as a whole, than taking the snapshot when the VM is switched off?

- using fstrim in VMs is (much?) more expensive when the VM has existing snapshots?

- it might be worthwhile to postpone upgrading from hammer to jewel, until after your big accouncement?

- we are on xfs (both for the ceph OSDs and the VMs) and that is the best combination to avoid these slow requests and CoW overhead with snapshots (or at least to minimise their impact)

Any other tips, do's or don'ts, or things to keep in mind related to snapshots, VM/OSD filesystems, or using fstrim..?

(our cluster is also small, hammer, three servers with 8 OSDs each, and journals on ssd, plenty of cpu/ram)

Again, thanks for your interesting post.

MJ
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux