Re: jewel blocked requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I also have this problem. Is it perhaps possible to block clients
entirely if it is not using a specific version of Ceph?

BTW, I often stumble upon the cephfs problem:
"client failing to respond to capability release", which result in
blocked requests aswell. But i'm not entirely sure if you run CephFS.

On 09/13/2016 02:44 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:28:50 -0500 shiva rkreddy wrote:
> 
>> By saying "old clients"  did you mean, (a) Client VMs running old Operating
>> System (b)  Client VMs/Volumes that are in-use for a long time and across
>> ceph releases ? Was there any tuning done to fix it?
>>
> I'm pretty sure he means c) that is:
> Clients (hosts) running older versions of Ceph.
> 
> Which is a pretty common thing, both because the Ceph cluster operator may
> not be controlling all the clients, there are version dependencies from
> things like OpenStack, the Ceph version on the client was installed by
> using an OS distro package (usually well aged).
> 
> What I'd like to know from Wido is if he opened a tracker issue for that,
> since this kind of regression should not happen [tm].
> 
> Christian
>  
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Wido den Hollander <wido@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> Op 12 september 2016 om 18:47 schreef "WRIGHT, JON R (JON R)" <
>>> jonrodwright@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Since upgrading to Jewel from Hammer, we're started to see HEALTH_WARN
>>>> because of 'blocked requests > 32 sec'.   Seems to be related to writes.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone else seen this?  Or can anyone suggest what the problem might
>>> be?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do you by any chance have old clients connecting? I saw this after a Jewel
>>> upgrade as well and it was because of very old clients still connecting to
>>> the cluster.
>>>
>>> Wido
>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Wido den Hollander <wido@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> Op 12 september 2016 om 18:47 schreef "WRIGHT, JON R (JON R)" <
>>> jonrodwright@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Since upgrading to Jewel from Hammer, we're started to see HEALTH_WARN
>>>> because of 'blocked requests > 32 sec'.   Seems to be related to writes.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone else seen this?  Or can anyone suggest what the problem might
>>> be?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do you by any chance have old clients connecting? I saw this after a Jewel
>>> upgrade as well and it was because of very old clients still connecting to
>>> the cluster.
>>>
>>> Wido
>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux