Re: rgw meta pool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Any help on this is much appreciated, am considering to fix this, given it’s confirmed an issue unless am missing something obvious. 

Thanks,
-Pavan.

On 9/8/16, 5:04 PM, "ceph-users on behalf of Pavan Rallabhandi" <ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of PRallabhandi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Trying it one more time on the users list.
    
    In our clusters running Jewel 10.2.2, I see default.rgw.meta pool running into large number of objects, potentially to the same range of objects contained in the data pool. 
    
    I understand that the immutable metadata entries are now stored in this heap pool, but I couldn’t reason out why the metadata objects are left in this pool even after the actual bucket/object/user deletions.
    
    The put_entry() promptly seems to be storing the same in the heap pool https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/src/rgw/rgw_metadata.cc#L880, but I do not see them to be reaped ever. Are they left there for some reason?
        
    Thanks,
    -Pavan.
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    ceph-users mailing list
    ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
    


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux