> Op 13 juli 2016 om 12:00 schreef Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator <goetz.reinicke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > Am 13.07.16 um 11:47 schrieb Wido den Hollander: > >> Op 13 juli 2016 om 8:19 schreef Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator <goetz.reinicke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> can anybody give some realworld feedback on what hardware > >> (CPU/Cores/NIC) you use for a 40Gb (file)server (smb and nfs)? The Ceph > >> Cluster will be mostly rbd images. S3 in the future, CephFS we will see :) > >> > >> Thanks for some feedback and hints! Regadrs . Götz > >> > > Why do you think you need 40Gb? That's some serious traffic to the OSDs and I doubt it's really needed. > > > > Latency-wise 40Gb isn't much better than 10Gb, so why not stick with that? > > > > It's also better to have more smaller nodes than a few big nodes with Ceph. > > > > Wido > > > Hi Wido, > > may be my post was misleading. The OSD Nodes do have 10G, the FIleserver > in front to the Clients/Destops should have 40G. > Ah, the fileserver will re-export RBD/Samba? Any Xeon E5 CPU will do just fine I think. Still, 40GbE is a lot of bandwidth! Wido > > OSD NODEs/Cluster 2*10Gb Bond ---- 40G Fileserver 40G ---- 1G/10G Clients > > /Götz > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |