Re: 40Gb fileserver/NIC suggestions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 13.07.16 um 11:47 schrieb Wido den Hollander:
>> Op 13 juli 2016 om 8:19 schreef Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator <goetz.reinicke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> can anybody give some realworld feedback on what hardware
>> (CPU/Cores/NIC) you use for a 40Gb (file)server (smb and nfs)? The Ceph
>> Cluster will be mostly rbd images. S3 in the future, CephFS we will see :)
>>
>> Thanks for some feedback and hints! Regadrs . Götz
>>
> Why do you think you need 40Gb? That's some serious traffic to the OSDs and I doubt it's really needed.
>
> Latency-wise 40Gb isn't much better than 10Gb, so why not stick with that?
>
> It's also better to have more smaller nodes than a few big nodes with Ceph.
>
> Wido
>
Hi Wido,

may be my post was misleading. The OSD Nodes do have 10G, the FIleserver
in front to the Clients/Destops should have 40G.


OSD NODEs/Cluster 2*10Gb Bond ---- 40G Fileserver 40G ---- 1G/10G Clients

    /Götz

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux