Hi, On 02/07/2015 10:16, Vickey Singh wrote: > Thanks Loic / Ken > > I am a bit confused , we are running OpenSource Ceph Firefly in Production and planning to upgrade to Stable hammer release. > > Questions : > > - Which exact Hammer release is currently stable release , that we can upgrade to without fear ? It is recommended that you upgrade to Hammer v0.94.2 and you can upgrade without fear. > - Or should we wait for couple of more months for 94.2 and 94.3 release comes out ? As you can see from the analysis at http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-devel/msg25069.html, there are a few differences between Red Hat Storage 1.3 and Hammer v0.94.2. If one of these matters to you, maybe you should wait until v0.94.3 is out since all of them should be included. You can also have a broader view of what v0.94.3 will have by looking at http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=78 which is the full inventory of what you will find in v0.94.3. You see there is a lot more than what Red Hat Storage 1.3 has and maybe some of these patches matter to you. The Ceph stable releases are published by following the process documented at http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO which is convenient if you want to track the release that matters to you. Nathan Cutler (SUSE) is organizing the next Firefly release (v0.80.11) and Abhishek Lekshmanan (Reliance Jio Infocomm) is organizing the next Hammer release (v0.94.3). > Did RedHat already started pushing their paying customers to move from Firefly to Hammer ?? I don't think a Red Hat employee would be allowed to answer this question, even if (s)he could ;-) Cheers > Regards > Vickey > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Hi, > Am 01.07.2015 um 23:35 schrieb Loic Dachary: > > Hi, > > > > The details of the differences between the Hammer point releases and the RedHat Ceph Storage 1.3 can be listed as described at > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-devel/msg24489.html reconciliation between hammer and v0.94.1.2 > > > > The same analysis should be done for https://github.com/ceph/ceph/releases/tag/v0.94.1.3 which presumably matches RedHat Ceph Storage 1.3. > > can you clarify this? In the past the ceph inktank releases were exactly > based on git tags. Is there now a "hidden" git repo for the ceph > releases done by redhat? Or how can we understand this? > > Stefan > > > > > Cheers > > > > On 01/07/2015 23:02, Vickey Singh wrote: > >> Hello Ceph lovers > >> > >> You would have noticed that recently RedHat has released RedHat Ceph Storage 1.3 > >> > >> http://redhatstorage.redhat.com/2015/06/25/announcing-red-hat-ceph-storage-1-3/ > >> > >> My question is > >> > >> - What's the exact version number of OpenSource Ceph is provided with this Product > >> - RHCS 1.3 Features that are mentioned in the blog , will all of them present in open source Ceph. > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards > >> Vickey > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ceph-users mailing list > >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
