CEPH placement groups and pool sizes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The formula was designed to be used on a per-pool basis.  Having said that, though, when looking at the number of PG's from a system-wide perspective, one does not want too many total PG's.  So, it's a balancing act, and it has been suggested that it's better to have slightly more PG's than you need, but not too many.

From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pieter Koorts
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 5:21 AM
To: ceph-users at ceph.com
Subject: CEPH placement groups and pool sizes

Hi,

Been doing some reading on the CEPH documentation and just wanted to clarify if anyone knows the (approximate) correct PG's for CEPH.

What I mean is lets say I have created one pool with 4096 placement groups.
Now instead of one pool I want two so if I were to create 2 pools instead would it be still 4096 placement groups per pool or would I divide it between the pools (e.g. 2048 pg per pool)

On a side note, per pool is that a recommended maximum of data before turning over to a new pool?

Regards

Pieter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/attachments/20140512/74e3424c/attachment.htm>


[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux