my impression is that 0.72 ceph-fuse is quite stable. But it's still slower than the kernel cephfs driver. Yan, Zheng On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Arne Wiebalck <Arne.Wiebalck@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Jan 24, 2014, at 11:08 AM, "Yan, Zheng" <ukernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Arne Wiebalck <Arne.Wiebalck@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We're about to start looking more seriously into CephFS and were wondering about the tradeoffs in our RHEL6.x based environment between using the kernel client (on 3.13) vs using the fuse-client. >>> Current Ceph version we use is 0.67.5. >> >> 3.13 kernel should be more stable and faster than 0.67 ceph-fuse. By >> the way, please use 0.72 mds. (0.72 mds can work with 0.67 osd and >> mon) > > Thanks! I upgraded the MDS to 0.72.2, worked fine. > > As you say "0.67 ceph-fuse": what about about updating the client to 0.72 as well, > would that bring significant improvements in ceph-fuse? > > Cheers, > Arne _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |