Re: CephFS: kernel vs. fuse

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Jan 24, 2014, at 11:08 AM, "Yan, Zheng" <ukernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Arne Wiebalck <Arne.Wiebalck@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> We're about to start looking more seriously into CephFS and were wondering about the tradeoffs in our RHEL6.x based environment between using the kernel client (on 3.13) vs using the fuse-client.
>> Current Ceph version we use is 0.67.5.
> 
> 3.13 kernel should be more stable and faster than 0.67 ceph-fuse. By
> the way, please use 0.72 mds. (0.72 mds can work with 0.67 osd and
> mon)

Thanks! I upgraded the MDS to 0.72.2, worked fine. 

As you say "0.67 ceph-fuse": what about about updating the client to 0.72 as well,
would that bring significant improvements in ceph-fuse?

Cheers,
 Arne

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux