Re: CephFS: kernel vs. fuse

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Arne Wiebalck <Arne.Wiebalck@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're about to start looking more seriously into CephFS and were wondering about the tradeoffs in our RHEL6.x based environment between using the kernel client (on 3.13) vs using the fuse-client.
> Current Ceph version we use is 0.67.5.

3.13 kernel should be more stable and faster than 0.67 ceph-fuse. By
the way, please use 0.72 mds. (0.72 mds can work with 0.67 osd and
mon)

Yan, Zheng

>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks!
>  Arne
>
> --
> Arne Wiebalck
> CERN IT
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux