30M namespaces is not a problem since they are pretty much just object name prefixes. 30M different cephx users probably would be a problem. -Sam On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Wido den Hollander <wido@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Op 7 januari 2017 om 2:03 schreef Blair Bethwaite <blair.bethwaite@xxxxxxxxx>: >> >> >> On 7 January 2017 at 04:04, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Namespaces are pretty much just a prefix, nothing tracks them. Are >> > you using them simply to avoid name conflicts? > > Yes, but also to be able to list objects (I know, slow!) per 'user'. > >> >> I assumed for some sort of data and/or security segregation using >> cephx? 30M pools is not exactly feasible... >> > > Eventually yes. We have 30M users in this system now and using namespaces seems like a clean way to separate their data inside RADOS. > > Might use different cephx users in the future if we want to. > > Wido > >> -- >> Cheers, >> ~Blairo >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
