Re: Safe maximum number of RADOS namespaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Op 7 januari 2017 om 2:03 schreef Blair Bethwaite <blair.bethwaite@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> 
> On 7 January 2017 at 04:04, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Namespaces are pretty much just a prefix, nothing tracks them.  Are
> > you using them simply to avoid name conflicts?

Yes, but also to be able to list objects (I know, slow!) per 'user'.

> 
> I assumed for some sort of data and/or security segregation using
> cephx? 30M pools is not exactly feasible...
> 

Eventually yes. We have 30M users in this system now and using namespaces seems like a clean way to separate their data inside RADOS.

Might use different cephx users in the future if we want to.

Wido

> -- 
> Cheers,
> ~Blairo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux