Re: Safe maximum number of RADOS namespaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7 January 2017 at 04:04, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Namespaces are pretty much just a prefix, nothing tracks them.  Are
> you using them simply to avoid name conflicts?

I assumed for some sort of data and/or security segregation using
cephx? 30M pools is not exactly feasible...

-- 
Cheers,
~Blairo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux