Josh Durgin writes: > On 11/30/2016 06:57 AM, Abhishek L wrote: >> >> Abhishek L writes: >> >>> Sage Weil writes: >>> >>>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Abhishek L wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Sage, Greg, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yuri Weinstein writes: >>>>> >>>>>> See updated status - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-32 >>>>>> >>>>>> Outstanding issues: >>>>>> >>>>>> knfs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16397 (same as in v10.2.3, Greg >>>>>> pls review/approve, assumed Approved ?) >>>>>> >>>>>> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 ((Sage >>>>>> pls review/approve, seems persistent, but maybe not a showstopper) >>>>>> >>>>>> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel) - deprecated (Nathan is still working >>>>>> to make it pass, see issues in the tacker summary above) >>>>>> >>>>>> Sage, jewel 10.2.4 can be released as soon as you agree with the >>>>>> findings/summary. >>>>> >>>>> Do you think we're ready to release 10.2.4 yet? >>>> >>>> I'm reproducing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 with logs to make >>>> sure this isn't a regression. >>>> >>>> We can ignore the infernalis runs. >>>> >>>> I think we can ignore the knfs selinux issue too.. Greg, can you confirm? >>>> >>> Added the prs 12001 & 12167 on top of the jewel branch and scheduled rados runs >>> at >>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2016-11-29_10:22:25-rados-wip-jewel-10-2-4-distro-basic-smithi/ & >>> >>> updated the tracker at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17851#note-17, >>> with details of the test. I'll update the progress once the suite goes >>> through >> >> Had around 11 tests fail from 296 scheduled, there were a couple of >> valgrind issues on ceph-mon (which were seen at earlier runs on jewel as >> well) and an s3test failure, rest of the issues were looking related to >> infrastructure as they were failing to get specific version numbers from >> gitbuilders. >> >> Reported this issue as: >> >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18089 >> >> subsequent re runs are still failing with similar errors. The details >> are updated at >> >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-37 >> >> The upgrade suite has also failed with similar errors. >> >> Overall it looks like we're close to cutting the release, as soon as we >> can get through these infra errors > > We should also get https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12207 in once the > master version (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12206) is merged - > likely later today. Do you want it in 10.2.4 itself? what all qe suites would you recommend if so? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
