On 11/30/2016 08:23 AM, Abhishek L wrote:
Josh Durgin writes:
On 11/30/2016 06:57 AM, Abhishek L wrote:
Abhishek L writes:
Sage Weil writes:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Abhishek L wrote:
Hi Sage, Greg,
Yuri Weinstein writes:
See updated status - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-32
Outstanding issues:
knfs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16397 (same as in v10.2.3, Greg
pls review/approve, assumed Approved ?)
upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 ((Sage
pls review/approve, seems persistent, but maybe not a showstopper)
upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel) - deprecated (Nathan is still working
to make it pass, see issues in the tacker summary above)
Sage, jewel 10.2.4 can be released as soon as you agree with the
findings/summary.
Do you think we're ready to release 10.2.4 yet?
I'm reproducing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 with logs to make
sure this isn't a regression.
We can ignore the infernalis runs.
I think we can ignore the knfs selinux issue too.. Greg, can you confirm?
Added the prs 12001 & 12167 on top of the jewel branch and scheduled rados runs
at
http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2016-11-29_10:22:25-rados-wip-jewel-10-2-4-distro-basic-smithi/ &
updated the tracker at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17851#note-17,
with details of the test. I'll update the progress once the suite goes
through
Had around 11 tests fail from 296 scheduled, there were a couple of
valgrind issues on ceph-mon (which were seen at earlier runs on jewel as
well) and an s3test failure, rest of the issues were looking related to
infrastructure as they were failing to get specific version numbers from
gitbuilders.
Reported this issue as:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18089
subsequent re runs are still failing with similar errors. The details
are updated at
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-37
The upgrade suite has also failed with similar errors.
Overall it looks like we're close to cutting the release, as soon as we
can get through these infra errors
We should also get https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12207 in once the
master version (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12206) is merged -
likely later today.
Do you want it in 10.2.4 itself? what all qe suites would you recommend if so?
Yes, we need to not break the librados API or ABI in stable series
especially.
The rgw suite would be enough - it's the only thing that really uses
setxattr.
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
