Sage Weil writes: > On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Abhishek L wrote: >> >> Hi Sage, Greg, >> >> >> Yuri Weinstein writes: >> >> > See updated status - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-32 >> > >> > Outstanding issues: >> > >> > knfs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16397 (same as in v10.2.3, Greg >> > pls review/approve, assumed Approved ?) >> > >> > upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 ((Sage >> > pls review/approve, seems persistent, but maybe not a showstopper) >> > >> > upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel) - deprecated (Nathan is still working >> > to make it pass, see issues in the tacker summary above) >> > >> > Sage, jewel 10.2.4 can be released as soon as you agree with the >> > findings/summary. >> >> Do you think we're ready to release 10.2.4 yet? > > I'm reproducing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 with logs to make > sure this isn't a regression. > > We can ignore the infernalis runs. > > I think we can ignore the knfs selinux issue too.. Greg, can you confirm? > Added the prs 12001 & 12167 on top of the jewel branch and scheduled rados runs at http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2016-11-29_10:22:25-rados-wip-jewel-10-2-4-distro-basic-smithi/ & updated the tracker at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17851#note-17, with details of the test. I'll update the progress once the suite goes through Best, Abhishek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
