On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Andrew Schoen wrote: > >> We could keep the implicit convention for `wip-*` or maybe something similar? > > > > Building everything that starts with wip-* sounds fine to me. But > > isn't that usually everything that we push to the ceph/ceph > > repository? What is is that we're trying to avoid building? > > > > John > > I think the idea is that we only want to build branches that we plan > to run tests against. As we add more flavors, distros and > architectures to build for the workload increases exponentially. The > system is designed to scale, but let's not build things we don't > really need. I think we need a "do not build" prefix and a "build this asap" prefix. Maybe nobuild-* and asap-*? sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
