On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Andrew Schoen <aschoen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> We could keep the implicit convention for `wip-*` or maybe something similar? >> >> Building everything that starts with wip-* sounds fine to me. But >> isn't that usually everything that we push to the ceph/ceph >> repository? What is is that we're trying to avoid building? >> >> John > > I think the idea is that we only want to build branches that we plan > to run tests against. As we add more flavors, distros and > architectures to build for the workload increases exponentially. The > system is designed to scale, but let's not build things we don't > really need. What branches in https://github.com/ceph/ceph are being built that do not need to be built? - Ken -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
