Re: new naming convention for building repos and binaries from branches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> We could keep the implicit convention for `wip-*` or maybe something similar?
>
> Building everything that starts with wip-* sounds fine to me.  But
> isn't that usually everything that we push to the ceph/ceph
> repository?  What is is that we're trying to avoid building?
>
> John

I think the idea is that we only want to build branches that we plan
to run tests against. As we add more flavors, distros and
architectures to build for the workload increases exponentially. The
system is designed to scale, but let's not build things we don't
really need.

Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux