>> We could keep the implicit convention for `wip-*` or maybe something similar? > > Building everything that starts with wip-* sounds fine to me. But > isn't that usually everything that we push to the ceph/ceph > repository? What is is that we're trying to avoid building? > > John I think the idea is that we only want to build branches that we plan to run tests against. As we add more flavors, distros and architectures to build for the workload increases exponentially. The system is designed to scale, but let's not build things we don't really need. Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html