On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 13:24 +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 15:57 +0100, John Spray wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I was just taking an updated look at how we could proceed to get > > > richacl support[1,2,3] built and tested in cephfs (probably for > > > luminous). > > > > > > The packages exist currently for Fedora. For testing, we will need > > > them for Ubuntu (probably just Xenial?), CentOS and RHEL (once there > > > are RHEL nodes in the sepia lab). > > > > > > I'm not very aware of ways forward for Ubuntu, but on the CentOS front > > > it seems like we have at least a couple of possibilities: > > > * Build ourselves (using some branch of the fedora packaging?) on a > > > Ceph gitbuilder/jenkins job and install from that repo in teuthology > > > jobs > > > * Get packages into CentOS Storage SIG and point teuthology at > > > external storage SIG repos during testing > > > > > > I believe we could ask nicely for some help from the storage SIG to > > > package richacl, but I'm not immediately sure if that's actually our > > > preferred approach for consuming packages in our CI vs. self-building > > > anything that's not in the distro. > > > > > > Does anybody have thoughts on the best way to go? > > > > > > Would also love to hear any thoughts about richacl SUSE and Ubuntu > > > > > > John > > > > > > 1. https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/6341 > > > 2. https://github.com/andreas-gruenbacher/richacl > > > 3. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/richacl.git/ > > > -- > > > > (cc'ing andreas) > > > > There are already richacl packages for Fedora, and the build > > requirements are pretty reasonable. Is there any reason not to just ask > > for those packages to be added to EPEL7? Should be pretty trivial to > > get them built. > > I've requested an epel7 branch to be added to: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/richacl/ > > as per: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests#Additional_branches_for_existing_packagesadded > > Not sure how long it will take to get that approved or if any > additional steps are needed; I guess we'll find out. > > Thanks, > Andreas Thanks Andreas! Last time I did it, it took around a day or so. You'll also need to kick off a package build once it's done. That should be all that's needed though. Cheers, -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
