On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 13:24 +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 15:57 +0100, John Spray wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > I was just taking an updated look at how we could proceed to get >> > > richacl support[1,2,3] built and tested in cephfs (probably for >> > > luminous). >> > > >> > > The packages exist currently for Fedora. For testing, we will need >> > > them for Ubuntu (probably just Xenial?), CentOS and RHEL (once there >> > > are RHEL nodes in the sepia lab). >> > > >> > > I'm not very aware of ways forward for Ubuntu, but on the CentOS front >> > > it seems like we have at least a couple of possibilities: >> > > * Build ourselves (using some branch of the fedora packaging?) on a >> > > Ceph gitbuilder/jenkins job and install from that repo in teuthology >> > > jobs >> > > * Get packages into CentOS Storage SIG and point teuthology at >> > > external storage SIG repos during testing >> > > >> > > I believe we could ask nicely for some help from the storage SIG to >> > > package richacl, but I'm not immediately sure if that's actually our >> > > preferred approach for consuming packages in our CI vs. self-building >> > > anything that's not in the distro. >> > > >> > > Does anybody have thoughts on the best way to go? >> > > >> > > Would also love to hear any thoughts about richacl SUSE and Ubuntu >> > > >> > > John >> > > >> > > 1. https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/6341 >> > > 2. https://github.com/andreas-gruenbacher/richacl >> > > 3. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/richacl.git/ >> > > -- >> > >> > (cc'ing andreas) >> > >> > There are already richacl packages for Fedora, and the build >> > requirements are pretty reasonable. Is there any reason not to just ask >> > for those packages to be added to EPEL7? Should be pretty trivial to >> > get them built. >> >> I've requested an epel7 branch to be added to: >> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/richacl/ >> >> as per: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests#Additional_branches_for_existing_packagesadded >> >> Not sure how long it will take to get that approved or if any >> additional steps are needed; I guess we'll find out. >> >> Thanks, >> Andreas > > Thanks Andreas! Last time I did it, it took around a day or so. You'll > also need to kick off a package build once it's done. That should be > all that's needed though. Things went fast this time. I've pushed the code to the epel7 branch and kicked off a build; the packages are ready. Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
