On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Andreas Grünbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2016-09-20 16:57 GMT+02:00 John Spray <jspray@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> Hi all, >> >> I was just taking an updated look at how we could proceed to get >> richacl support[1,2,3] built and tested in cephfs (probably for >> luminous). >> >> The packages exist currently for Fedora. For testing, we will need >> them for Ubuntu (probably just Xenial?), CentOS and RHEL (once there >> are RHEL nodes in the sepia lab). >> >> I'm not very aware of ways forward for Ubuntu, but on the CentOS front >> it seems like we have at least a couple of possibilities: >> * Build ourselves (using some branch of the fedora packaging?) on a >> Ceph gitbuilder/jenkins job and install from that repo in teuthology >> jobs >> * Get packages into CentOS Storage SIG and point teuthology at >> external storage SIG repos during testing >> >> I believe we could ask nicely for some help from the storage SIG to >> package richacl, but I'm not immediately sure if that's actually our >> preferred approach for consuming packages in our CI vs. self-building >> anything that's not in the distro. >> >> Does anybody have thoughts on the best way to go? > > As Jeff has suggested, does having the package in epel7 help you? I think this should work for the Ceph CI, I believe we already point our test nodes to EPEL -- thank you. John > >> Would also love to hear any thoughts about richacl SUSE and Ubuntu > > I don't have any experience with Ubuntu packaging. We can add stuff to > the upstream repository if that helps. > > Thanks, > Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
