2016-09-20 16:57 GMT+02:00 John Spray <jspray@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi all, > > I was just taking an updated look at how we could proceed to get > richacl support[1,2,3] built and tested in cephfs (probably for > luminous). > > The packages exist currently for Fedora. For testing, we will need > them for Ubuntu (probably just Xenial?), CentOS and RHEL (once there > are RHEL nodes in the sepia lab). > > I'm not very aware of ways forward for Ubuntu, but on the CentOS front > it seems like we have at least a couple of possibilities: > * Build ourselves (using some branch of the fedora packaging?) on a > Ceph gitbuilder/jenkins job and install from that repo in teuthology > jobs > * Get packages into CentOS Storage SIG and point teuthology at > external storage SIG repos during testing > > I believe we could ask nicely for some help from the storage SIG to > package richacl, but I'm not immediately sure if that's actually our > preferred approach for consuming packages in our CI vs. self-building > anything that's not in the distro. > > Does anybody have thoughts on the best way to go? As Jeff has suggested, does having the package in epel7 help you? > Would also love to hear any thoughts about richacl SUSE and Ubuntu I don't have any experience with Ubuntu packaging. We can add stuff to the upstream repository if that helps. Thanks, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
