On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi John, > > While testing the CephFS jewel backports found in the jewel-backports branch, we ran into a memory leak that consistently happen: > > http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-06-16_02:28:14-fs-jewel-backports---basic-smithi/263842 The client leak is a false positive, I'm not sure what is triggering it (it seems to only happen on centos nodes, and not be silenced by the suppression that we have in the valgrind config). http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14794 Is it definitely not happening on the jewel branch, or is it possible that the jewel run just wasn't executing that test on centos nodes? The MDS leaks are currently ignored in the ceph.py task (yuck!) so they're probably happening everywhere else too and you can ignore them. John > and that is not present in the jewel branch > > http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-06-28_23:43:39-fs-jewel---basic-smithi/282493/ > > Meaning one of the backports is doing something wrong. Or there is a backport fixing the leak that is missing. > > This one looks interesting to me > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/37b7b09ee19ad64362c2faf63461353c03a36ada > > There also are related to leaks but I'm not so sure. > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/89f74c98ea43df46291c8bec890b3a75c7ce38b4 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/4c52bf9ed47d52510536ebc34bd6c56adba1df53 > > If you have ideas on how to approach this and save random exploration time, it would be most welcome. If not, I'll get it eventually, no worries :-) > > Cheers > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
