Re: ceph-mds jewel backports leak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



To be precise, the backports that are related to CephFS and in the jewel-backports branch are:

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9405/files
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9547/files
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9558/files
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9559/files
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9560/files
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9562/files

On 06/07/2016 12:51, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> While testing the CephFS jewel backports found in the jewel-backports branch, we ran into a memory leak that consistently happen:
> 
> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-06-16_02:28:14-fs-jewel-backports---basic-smithi/263842
> 
> and that is not present in the jewel branch
> 
> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-06-28_23:43:39-fs-jewel---basic-smithi/282493/
> 
> Meaning one of the backports is doing something wrong. Or there is a backport fixing the leak that is missing.
> 
> This one looks interesting to me
> 
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/37b7b09ee19ad64362c2faf63461353c03a36ada
> 
> There also are related to leaks but I'm not so sure.
> 
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/89f74c98ea43df46291c8bec890b3a75c7ce38b4
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/4c52bf9ed47d52510536ebc34bd6c56adba1df53
> 
> If you have ideas on how to approach this and save random exploration time, it would be most welcome. If not, I'll get it eventually, no worries :-)
> 
> Cheers
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux