Re: RBD volumes for bare-metal hosts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Radoslaw Zarzynski
<rzarzynski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
> Thanks for the quick and detailed response.
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The code for exclusive-lock, object-map and fast-diff is pretty much
>> ready.  We had a large prerequisite that had to go in before any of
>> these and it's been merged into 4.7, so it's now a matter of review and
>> more comprehensive testing.  deep-flatten isn't ready, but should
>> follow shortly after.
>
> This sounds great.
>
>> No concrete plans for mirroring support yet.
>
> AFAIK the sole dependency for mirroring (from RBD volume
> consumer's POV) is journaling that in turn requires exclusive-lock.
> Having the last one in the code base opens a door for the whole
> feature. The user-space daemon (rbd-mirror) and tooling might be
> reused. Is that correct?

Yes, that should be correct.

Thanks,

                Ilya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux