Re: ceph-disk improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Lars,

There is some preliminary thoughts at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7475.

Cheers

On 07/04/2016 12:51, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2016-04-07T12:31:21, Sebastien Han <shan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> One thing I'd like to see and I know we discussed that with Loïc a
>> while ago is ceph-disk being idempotent when it comes to the device
>> preparation.
>> Running "ceph-disk prepare" against a device should result in an exit
>> 0 if the disk already has an OSD prepared on it (unless we do
>> something like --force, which will then zap the disk).
>> I had to implement this logic in ceph-ansible (and the guys from
>> chef/puppet probably did the same), so now it's done but i'll be happy
>> to leave ceph-disk doing it :).
>>
>> Thoughts?
> 
> Basically, +1.
> 
> Owen (who works on salt-ceph) has a love/love relationship with the word
> "idempotent" as well.
> 
> Note that it should probably only exit=0 if the OSD matches the current
> fsid?
> 
> 
> Regards,
>     Lars
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux