On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, Owen Synge wrote: > On 08/04/2015 12:13 PM, Owen Synge wrote: > > On 08/03/2015 09:07 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > >> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Owen Synge wrote: > > > I will check the rgw. > > It is not working due to missing: > > /usr/lib/ceph-radosgw/ceph-radosgw-prestart.sh > > which is a useful check tool, available in this commit: > > https://github.com/SUSE/ceph/commit/92ef2ecfe0c0c0b0df4c9349310f930057202305 I removed this reference from the unit file, see https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/4d10dc134b817160bab6aecb9f5c08fb2d4f08e6 mainly because I didn't have a copy of the prestart script in my tree. Looking at it now, though, it's not clear to me that any of those steps are necessary. They might be useful in making a legacy install/config continue functioning, but I don't think any of the complexity is needed for newly created rgw instances, and I'd prefer to make the upgrade process look like - upgrade ceph - killall radosgw - [optional] rename and sanitize ceph.conf section if there are special configs - ceph-deploy rgw create $hostname than worry about trying to keep supporting the kludgey way we used to deploy rgw. FWIW with the wip-systemd branch I was able to deploy new rgw instances on fc22 without any issues... sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
