Re: provisioning teuthology targets with OpenStack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Zack,

I think it works and I'll start using it. For the record

https://github.com/ceph/teuthology/compare/master...dachary:wip-6502-openstack?expand=1#diff-88b99bb28683bd5b7e3a204826ead112R318

is what I have right now. There are a few things that need cleaning but nothing major I hope. I'll clean them up after you had time to review the preliminary pull requests at https://github.com/ceph/teuthology/pulls.

Cheers

On 09/06/2015 14:58, Loic Dachary wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09/06/2015 18:25, Zack Cerza wrote:
>> Hi Loic!
>>
>> I'm really happy to hear you have the time and motivation to work on this! It's something I've wanted to get to for a while, but other things keep getting in the way.
>>
>> I'd suggest looking at teuthology.provision.Downburst to investigate maybe pulling some of its functionality into a base class that a potential OpenStack subclass could also benefit from. I'd love to see us using a common interface for all of our provisioning. If that seems like a lot of work, I'd be willing to be the one to create the base class and work with you to make sure its API was useful for OpenStack as well.
>>
> 
> Thanks for the pointers. I'll write something that works and get back to you to make it acceptable :-)
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Zack
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: "Zack Cerza" <zcerza@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2015 11:04:52 AM
>>> Subject: provisioning teuthology targets with OpenStack
>>>
>>> Hi Zack,
>>>
>>> I'm motivated by my recent experience with hacking teuthology and containers
>>> :-) I'd like to give
>>>
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/6502 "provision targets using a cloud API"
>>>
>>> a shot with OpenStack in mind (because I know nothing of EC2 really). The
>>> idea is to make it relatively easy for someone with access to an OpenStack
>>> tenant to using instead of downburst. Not only would that simplify the
>>> development process for people without access to the lab, it would also
>>> allow the addition of more horsepower to the lab. What do you think ?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> --
>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>
>>>
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux