On 09/06/2015 18:25, Zack Cerza wrote: > Hi Loic! > > I'm really happy to hear you have the time and motivation to work on this! It's something I've wanted to get to for a while, but other things keep getting in the way. > > I'd suggest looking at teuthology.provision.Downburst to investigate maybe pulling some of its functionality into a base class that a potential OpenStack subclass could also benefit from. I'd love to see us using a common interface for all of our provisioning. If that seems like a lot of work, I'd be willing to be the one to create the base class and work with you to make sure its API was useful for OpenStack as well. > Thanks for the pointers. I'll write something that works and get back to you to make it acceptable :-) > Thanks, > Zack > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> To: "Zack Cerza" <zcerza@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2015 11:04:52 AM >> Subject: provisioning teuthology targets with OpenStack >> >> Hi Zack, >> >> I'm motivated by my recent experience with hacking teuthology and containers >> :-) I'd like to give >> >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/6502 "provision targets using a cloud API" >> >> a shot with OpenStack in mind (because I know nothing of EC2 really). The >> idea is to make it relatively easy for someone with access to an OpenStack >> tenant to using instead of downburst. Not only would that simplify the >> development process for people without access to the lab, it would also >> allow the addition of more horsepower to the lab. What do you think ? >> >> Cheers >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> >> -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
