Re: radosgw: bad content length

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Right, the we should call strict_strtoll() instead. I opened issue
#10701, and sent a pull request for the fix.

Thanks,
Yehuda

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Axel Dunkel <ad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  >
>> > Telling from the source code the issue seems not to be that the
> content
>> > lengths do not match, rather that the http-header Content-Length is
> not
>> > parseable (allthough the header is displayed fine in the debug
> output). If
>> > strict_strtol returns an error, to be exact - ?
>> >
>>
>> In that case the time is meaningless. How big is Content-Length when
> it fails?
>
> CONTENT_LENGTH=2147483648
> just a bit too much for a long - ?
>
> Best regards
> Axel Dunkel
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux